a question...
Which is better--stability or daring?
posted by yonderincarp at 08:46
28 September 2006
Previous Posts
- on the reservation...
- one shot one kill...
- and speaking of the waters...
- the sea will wash in...
- cinderella had it easy...
- another business idea (this one's for betzhi)...
- nomads, cannibis, and foreign policy...
- on the homeland...
- a fragment...
- on certain ethical implications of fossil fuels...
6 Comments:
neither
daring; you have to risk in order to gain.
We regret the things we don't do more than the things we do.
Daring is Mas Fina.
Maybe daring comes from stability.
negative mr. anonymous--daring gives confidence and therefore establishes stability as being relative and inconsequential. ie. f*@# stability. -nb
How does confidence (an internal aspect) necessarily make stability relative (and inconsequential)? I don't follow the connection.
Do you mean that when you are confident, it will replace any need for stability?
Can't you be confident, daring, and lose?
Post a Comment
<< Home